0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Fj5JRHXAax true
0.09/0.39	% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
0.09/0.39	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.39	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.39	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.09/0.39	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.09/0.39	% CPULimit : 1440
0.09/0.39	% WCLimit  : 180
0.09/0.39	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:15:53 UTC 2026
0.09/0.39	% CPUTime  : 
0.09/0.39	% Running portfolio for 1440 s
0.09/0.39	% File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.09/0.39	% Number of cores: 8
0.09/0.39	% Python version: Python 3.12.3
0.09/0.40	% Running in HO mode
0.30/0.61	% Total configuration time : 828
0.30/0.61	% Estimated wc time : 1656
0.30/0.61	% Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
0.41/0.68	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
0.41/0.71	% Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
0.41/0.71	% done 0 iterations in 0.015s
0.41/0.71	% SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
0.41/0.71	% SZS output start Refutation
0.41/0.71	thf(sk__type, type, sk_: (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > $i > $i).
0.41/0.71	thf(three_type, type, three: ($i > $i) > $i > $i).
0.41/0.71	thf(sk__1_type, type, sk__1: (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > $i).
0.41/0.71	thf(plus_type, type, plus: (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > 
0.41/0.71	                           ($i > $i) > $i > $i).
0.41/0.71	thf(plus_ax, axiom,(( plus  ) =
0.41/0.71	  (^[M:( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ),N:( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ),X:( $i > $i ),
0.41/0.71	     Y:$i]:
0.41/0.71	   ( M @ X @ ( N @ X @ Y ) )))).
0.41/0.71	thf('0', plain,
0.41/0.71	    (( plus ) =
0.41/0.71	     ( ^[M:( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ),N:( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ),
0.41/0.71	         X:( $i > $i ),Y:$i]:
0.41/0.71	       ( M @ X @ ( N @ X @ Y ) ) )),
0.41/0.71	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [plus_ax])).
0.41/0.71	thf('1', plain,
0.41/0.71	    (( plus ) =
0.41/0.71	     ( ^[V_1:( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ),V_2:( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ),
0.41/0.71	         V_3:( $i > $i ),V_4:$i]:
0.41/0.71	       ( V_1 @ V_3 @ ( V_2 @ V_3 @ V_4 ) ) )),
0.41/0.71	    define([status(thm)])).
0.41/0.71	thf(three_ax, axiom,(( three  ) =
0.41/0.71	  (^[X:( $i > $i ),Y:$i]: ( X @ ( X @ ( X @ Y ) ) )))).
0.41/0.71	thf('2', plain,
0.41/0.71	    (( three ) = ( ^[X:( $i > $i ),Y:$i]: ( X @ ( X @ ( X @ Y ) ) ) )),
0.41/0.71	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [three_ax])).
0.41/0.71	thf('3', plain,
0.41/0.71	    (( three ) =
0.41/0.71	     ( ^[V_1:( $i > $i ),V_2:$i]: ( V_1 @ ( V_1 @ ( V_1 @ V_2 ) ) ) )),
0.41/0.71	    define([status(thm)])).
0.41/0.71	thf(thm, conjecture,
0.41/0.71	  (?[N:( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i )]: ( ( plus @ N @ three ) = ( three ) ))).
0.41/0.71	thf(zf_stmt_0, conjecture,
0.41/0.71	  (?[X4:( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i )]:
0.41/0.71	   ( ![V_3:( $i > $i ),V_4:$i]:
0.41/0.71	     ( ( X4 @ V_3 @ ( V_3 @ ( V_3 @ ( V_3 @ V_4 ) ) ) ) =
0.41/0.71	       ( V_3 @ ( V_3 @ ( V_3 @ V_4 ) ) ) ) ))).
0.41/0.71	thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
0.41/0.71	  (~( ?[X4:( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i )]:
0.41/0.71	      ( ![V_3:( $i > $i ),V_4:$i]:
0.41/0.71	        ( ( X4 @ V_3 @ ( V_3 @ ( V_3 @ ( V_3 @ V_4 ) ) ) ) =
0.41/0.71	          ( V_3 @ ( V_3 @ ( V_3 @ V_4 ) ) ) ) ) )),
0.41/0.71	  inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
0.41/0.71	thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
0.41/0.71	    (![X0 : ($i > $i) > $i > $i]:
0.41/0.71	       ((X0 @ (sk_ @ X0) @ 
0.41/0.71	         (sk_ @ X0 @ (sk_ @ X0 @ (sk_ @ X0 @ (sk__1 @ X0)))))
0.41/0.71	         != (sk_ @ X0 @ (sk_ @ X0 @ (sk_ @ X0 @ (sk__1 @ X0)))))),
0.41/0.71	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
0.41/0.71	thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, ($false),
0.41/0.71	    inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0])).
0.41/0.71	
0.41/0.71	% SZS output end Refutation
0.41/0.71	
0.41/0.71	
0.41/0.72	% Terminating...
0.41/0.75	% Runner terminated.
0.41/0.76	% Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
0.41/0.77	EOF